Divine Prostitution: A History of Sacred Sex Work

A She-Savior
Divine Prostitution
© by Mikhail Armalinsky
translated from Russian by Dr. Brian James Baer
This essay was originally published in the volume of Selected Works by Mikhail
Armalinsky “Chtob Znali!” (“Let It Be Known!”) in series "Russian Concealed
Literature". Moscow, “Ladomir”, 2002, 861 pages; ISBN 5-86218-379-5
Amid the burning buildings the prostitutes
Will carry me aloft alone
And show me to God to justify themselves.
Vladimir Mayakovsky
Give them the price for which they loved
So for the same price they can mourn.
Joseph Brodsky
I love prostitutes,
Women honest and pure...
Mikhail Armalinsky
A Short History of Prostitution
If prostitution is the world's oldest profession, as the saying goes, then let's not forget
that in the beginning was the Word and when the Word become the first deed, it had
already turned into prostitution.
Writings on prostitution could fill the Library at Alexandria many times over.
Or, in the contemporary vernacular--the Library of Congress. Or, perhaps, in Russian
terms--the Publichka, or Public Library. Incidentally, any public library is really a
prototype of the ideal public house, where books are given out to anyone and, for that
matter, for free. The reader and not the book decides when to open it, how much of it
to read, and when to close it. And in order to satisfy the desire for books that are in
especially high demand, the library clones these women, forgive me, books, and
carries them in multiple copies.
I must, from time to time, make reference to the various literature on the topic
or else the ignoramuses and chronic doubters will brush aside all I've said as
fabrication. But don't brush too vigorously, or you'll bump against my bibliography.
On the other hand, there are those pedants who will exclaim:
"How can you write about prostitution without mentioning The Whores of Tabatukt!"
Or some other monograph. Well, you can't please everyone.
Only the prostitute can please each and every one.
In the good old days, there was an abundance and variety of women, who--and
this is the most important thing--were not considered sinful for being loose. Constant
wars that annihilated the men and produced streams of women slaves brought back as
trophies, all this made the female population abundant and complaisant. Once the
fighting was over and there were again too many men, the women began to raise their
prices, which provoked a new war, which immediately caused the number of men to
decrease and the number of women to increase, and prices were once again at the
service of desire.
Before Christianity prostitution was not a problem. At first, everything was
peachy: prostitution was considered sacred for the act of copulation and the pleasure
that it gives were by rights considered gifts from God.
The great female deities of antiquity were great prostitutes--Ishtar, for
example. They hadn't thought up the devil yet. People rejoiced in the experience of
orgasm and thanked the gods and the wonderful prostitutes by giving them money for
holy works. There did arise from time to time twisted rulers who tried this way and
that to oppress and restrict prostitution, and in those times there were people who
preferred to blame everyone but themselves for their problems. In the ancient Near
East, for example, prostitutes were forced to go about in public with uncovered
heads[1]--a kind of oppression nevertheless. And perhaps, a differentiating sign, so
that one could immediately see what was available. A uniform that made it easy for
clients to recognize them.
But the most virulent opponents of prostitution in ancient times were the
impotent. Prostitution, like so many other phenomena, inspires hatred and accusations
of immorality only in those who can't take advantage of it.[2]
In general prostitution thrived for it was a part of religious ritual, or more
precisely, it was a religious act. Holy prostitutes performed the Dance of Time; they
relieved one another every hour and in this way kept track of time. Then the monastic
reading of prayers with monks relieving each other every hour became the Christian
innovation for marking the passage of time.[3]
This provides no evidence of technological progress in the exact measurement
of time, and what joy is there in looking at a lice-ridden monk. Of course, we can
consider that the other monks hiding behind the one reading the prayers, who was
essentially on the lookout, engaged in fornication with nuns and prostitutes.
Prostitutes were also considered to be soothe-sayers. The Hebrew word zonah
means both prostitute and prophet.
There were peoples that honored prostitutes as kings and touchingly offered
tribute to their profound learning.[4]
Every woman in Babylon was a temple prostitute before getting married: one
of the mythological reasons for this was to pacify the Goddess who supposedly did
not approve of monogamy.
Some pretty cool facts, huh?
Enjoying the services of a prostitute was a common occurrence, which became
shameful only when a man refused to settle his account.[5]
It is precisely this behavior that came to be celebrated several thousand years
later in the anecdote of the prostitute who, after having fulfilled her side of the
bargain, asked the officer who was putting his clothes back on: "And the money?" To
which she got the following explanation: "A Russian officer never takes money for
giving satisfaction."
Street prostitutes in ancient times never demanded money up front; they even
refused it, saying: "In the morning you can set the price yourself,"[6] so confident
were they in their art and in the fairness of men.
Another Honest Prostitute, whose client gave her 3000 rupees in advance and
then disappeared, waited three years for him, refusing to accept anything from anyone
in order to repay her obligation.[7]
Truly, there is little that is flattering that can be said about current customs in
comparison to those of that golden age.
In contrast to us, other peoples no less civilized than we but having lived long
ago, as well as peoples living today but in the developmental stage of barbarism, did
not and do not consider prostitution to be either shameful or a crime. Rather, they
accepted it as a pleasant necessity of life, as one social institution among others, such
as marriage, co-habitation and other sexual/amorous agreements.[8]
In ancient Greece and Rome prostitutes were no longer worshipped as deities
but continued to be loved openly. Hetaeras and courtesans in ancient Greece were
accorded the same political and legal rights as men, while wives were reduced to the
level of a servant.
The variety of prostitutes was beyond number. They followed every path that a
man might take. In addition to street prostitutes, there were bakery prostitutes, circus,
temple, inn, and cemetery prostitutes; you didn't need to look for prostitutes--women
were right at hand, offering themselves in addition to the other services that they
rendered. Those who weren't pleased with a disorderly single woman could go to a
bordello where guests were greeted with a variety of women, and so could be choosey
in their selection. Or not so choosey.
Prostitution was believed to be a necessary moral safeguard for virtuous
mothers, wives and sisters.[9]
Cicerone and Caton approved of prostitution as a necessary social institution
created for the defense of marriage.[10]
That is to say, in the classical period, divine prostitution acquired a utilitarian
purpose; it became an instrument that provided a certain degree of peace and stability
in society.
Pagan prostitutes were intermediaries between the parishioner and god, that is,
they fulfilled the role of the priestess. In other words, prostitutes were the
intermediaries between men and the gods.[11]
Not surprisingly, Christians decided to take this lucrative business into their
own hands and to permit communication with God only through the mediation of
male-priests.
Christianity made prostitution into a sin, in the best case, tolerated. By
tolerating prostitution, they didn't have to tend to it.
Prostitution evolved from a sacred, religious activity to an epicurial pastime
and ended by being just tolerated.[12] Mantegazza, of course, went too far in saying
that it had "ended." May it flourish once again and forever!
There were however glorious exceptions even in Christian times. For example,
at the end of the XV century in Avignon, a church bordello was set up, in which part
of the time the women prayed and part of the time they received clients--and only
Christian ones. Infidels were not allowed in. Pope Julius II was so pleased with this
that at the beginning of the XVI century, he organized just such a public house in
Rome.[13]
Some anti-clerical writers argued that prostitutes should be respected for their
compliance, which is a kind of goodness. Lorenzo Valla in the XV century wrote that
prostitutes deserved more admiration from the human race than nuns with their
chastity and virginity.[14]
Thomas Aquinas compared prostitution to plumbing in a palace: if you remove
it, the palace will fill up with waste. (Well, I would compare prostitution to a palace.
If it wasn't there, all you would see were the gray shacks of monogamy.)
Theologians easily agreed with the sale of the body for money, describing this
act as "legalized immorality." Thomas Aquinas, the inventor of the phrase, thought
that prostitutions protected men from homosexuality. (Out of ignorance, it seems, he
failed to take into account the existence of male prostitution.)
Saint Augustine also understood: "If you banish the prostitute from human
society, everything will collapse from the intrusion of lust." (America, which has
prohibited prostitution for many years now, proves that nothing, it turns out, will
collapse from the intrusion of lust.)
As a result, the Christian oppression and expulsion of prostitutes has led to a
situation, in which they now not only demand money up front, they are forced to
reduce themselves to half hour or even fifteen-minute increments.
Even in the nineteenth century, blessed in terms of prostitution, prostitutes
would spend the whole night and didn't ask for money in advance.
Sasha Chernyi[15] confirmed it:
"...If you didn't pay, it's like the prostitute
Who won't spend the whole night and leaves."
That would mean that she stayed part of the night without having taken any
money!!!
And only remembered to ask in the middle of the night.
In olden times, the prostitute and the virgin were equated, insofar as the
prostitute did not wed. And those who were not wed immediately fell into the
category of the strange, in which extremes were brought together. And mixed:
prostitutes could ritually renew their virginity by a method that would later become
universal: submersion in water. A portentous forerunner of baptism.
Christianity did not want to entirely do away with prostitution, but wanted to
deny it any spiritual or divine content. And so they re-named the temples bordellos.
Red lights came from a sign for Roman venerii, on which were depicted a
phallus in a state of erection, painted red.
A house was where a woman bowed to her flame, which she could share with
men other then her husband. And so, the Christian "mistress of the house" signified a
woman who gave herself to many men.[16]
In the normal countries of the East, everything was done for delight.
Prostitution in China from time immemorial was raised to the level of a high
art and was an alternative to family relations.
Marco Polo who visit China from 1271-1275, wrote:
"These women are so accomplished in all the arts of allurement, and readily
adapt their conversation to all sorts of
persons, insomuch that strangers who have once tasted their attractions seem to get
bewitched, and are so taken with their blandishments and their fascinating ways that
they never can get these out of their heads."[17]
This is where they should have dragged the unbelieving Thomas Aquinas and
even Augustine to make them a little holier.
Christianity represented a brilliant opportunity for all the sexual losers to
legally and nobly rehabilitate their feebleness and to honor it as a blessing.
Prostitution was denied any spirituality on the principle that it cultivated
atheism: one keeps babbling on that prostitution is evil while at the same time
trembling at the sight of it.
The flight of the raznochintsy[18] and the nobility to the people in the
nineteenth century was in part inspired by a desire to imitate the sexual liberation of
the folk. They wanted to stop holding women up as some kind of lofty creatures
before whom they must bow and, simply, to start screwing them, like a peasant. But
they lacked the courage for that and so instead they took prostitutes from the bordellos
and re-educated them, re-educated them until they not only shared a bed, but also
could exchange wedding vows. All of this was done out of a far-fetched sense of guilt,
which later led to a quick break and the return of the prostitute to the bosom of her
art.[19]
In the modern period of universal Christianity, people have begun to invent
justifications for the very existence of prostitution or for its gracious legalization by
the state--but why exactly? It's the same as justifying yourself before some bastard in
the government or the church for being alive. And the next thing you know, you'll
have to start apologizing before the entire world for the fact that dicks get hard.
Today, only the Buddhist East still preserves its ecstatic, innocent relationship
to prostitution.
"He, who does not spend his life honoring the lingam, is indeed unhappy,
sinful and unfortunate." --Shiva Purana.[20]
A society's relationship to prostitution is defined by and founded on its
relationship to sex. If, in Christian societies, copulation itself is considered dirty and
sinful, then, naturally, prostitutes, who perform the act of copulation particularly often
and without shame will become a symbol of filth and sin. If in a society sex is
considered permissible only in marriage, then the prostitute will become the devil
incarnate, tempting men and destroying families. If morality dictates that what is most
important in a woman is education and a career and that the way to show respect for a
woman is to deal with her as if she didn't have a cunt, then the prostitute as the
opposite of all that will be considered a worthless woman leading a useless life.
However, the falseness of such views is belied by the eternal existence of prostitution,
persecuted, but honestly serving the truth of desires.
For desire is truth.
The necessity of prostitution came to form the structural base of society thanks
to a ruse, of which the builders themselves may not have been entirely aware. In the
nineteenth century, doctors came to the conclusion that copulation was harmful when
it was excessive, but it was acceptable when it occurred without superfluous emotions
and a loss of composure. From this they concluded that copulation with a prostitute,
insofar as it was without emotion and passion, was less dangerous than with one's
wife. After such a finding, prostitution blossomed in even more magnificent
colors.[21]
The ruse consisted of the fact that, as is well known, it is copulation with one's
wife that occurs coldly and without passion, out of habit, while copulation with a
prostitute, as with any new woman, is filled with passion and trembling. And so, while
giving lip service to wives, these doctors gave their blessing to the service provided by
prostitution.
These historical excursions may be useful for the reader who is racked with
guilt and shame. He may be somewhat relieved to find out that in the past things were,
heck, a lot livelier. But in the long run, what difference does it make if someone in
ancient times experienced lust just like you, and with whom he satisfied that lust, if
you yourself are experiencing lust right now and have the money to call someone over
to the house who can satisfy it? What's the use of turning to history to look for
justifications when desire itself is nothing less than its own justification, offering
revelations in the course of satisfying it. Believe in desire and not in ideas about it.
When they say that the new is just the past that's been forgotten, there is a
fundamental inaccuracy there. People forget the past only when the past is concealed
from them or when they are purposely not reminded of it. For this reason, the study of
history is important to prevent any bogus novelty from arising that might scare or
tempt you, and to provide historical confirmation of the naturalness of your desires.
History, however, can be manipulated and we must treat its transmission with
caution. That is to say, we need to trust not so much history as our own feelings. You
have the urge to copulate, that means, it's good. You don't have the urge? That means
you'll get it again soon.
A Comprehensive Definition of the Prostitute
So, now begins the boring task of classifying and defining. But it can't be
avoided--it's necessary. For the sake of mutual understanding.
What is a prostitute?
In defining a "decent" woman, questions, as a rule, do not arise. The concept is
self-evident, requiring no clarification. And if clarification were necessary, it would
be minor. A "decent" woman is one who does not screw at all or who only screws her
husband. Some of course would wish to add: not very often. Here we must determine
what is meant by "not very often": once a day, once a month? Moreover, if she's
screwing her husband, it's in a securely locked room so that no one can see. And the
mess starts here. No, we're not going to add anything. Let's say she only screws her
husband. But just the one? And if she gets divorced or is widowed and marries for a
second or third time? And if she marries five times? That's already five guys. So let's
say five, but all of them legal, all of them with an official government certificate. And
not with five guys at once, but one at a time, so that once she is divorced and
remarried, fooling around with her ex is a no-no. Ugh, it seems we've clarified things
with decent women.
Now let's turn to prostitutes. What is a prostitute? Over the course of centuries,
people have thought up a bunch of definitions. Many bunches. The first that comes
annoyingly to mind defines her as a woman who takes compensation for screwing.
Well, the fact that she takes something doesn't make her a prostitute. A lot of
law abiding wives do the same. And when their husbands don't give them anything,
then they have a headache or they're beset by overwhelming fatigue.
If a woman who sells the delights offered by her body is called a prostitute,
then young women who marry rich old men deserve the same name, as do wives who
set a price for their kisses to get money from their husband, and women who befriend
great men in order to go down in history.[22]
To have many men without taking money--this isn't a prostitute either, just a
loving women. But to take money--and from many men--that, it seems, is something
like prostitution. But from how many men? One medieval scholastic, by no means
stingy in his calculations, maintained that a woman could not be called a prostitute
until she had given herself to 23,000 men. (It seems, he wanted to portray all
prostitutes as "decent" women through the noble means of arithmetic). Others set
more modest limits: from 40-60.[23]
Let's say, a woman actively engaged in fornication for 20 years and that means
that she had approximately three beaux per year. That comes to 60. And each of them
kept her and bought her clothes or paid her rent--can she be called a prostitute? If not,
we have to increase our limit. Perhaps, we should go back to 23,000?
They say that people who fornicate with ease are behaving like animals.
However, animals, while able to fornicate without shame before their own kind, don't
take it lightly. Before screwing, animals court one another, performing ritual dances,
cajoling, sniffing, and the devil only knows what else. The main difference between a
man and an animal is that a man can begin fornicating immediately, without any
rituals. All rituals take either money or strength (rape), but the shortest period leading
up to fornication is achieved through money.
Young girls are taught that they should not give themselves to men out of lust,
but under no circumstances should they do it for free. For marriage, love, concern, for
anything, just not for money. Lust in marriage is graciously allowed, but those who
allow it know that in marriage lust very quickly bites the dust. The free satisfaction of
lust is just as frightening for society as the satisfaction of lust for money. Society
invented another currency for the purchase of enjoyment--married life.
Lust for lust--that's not prostitution, but true love at first sight, when without
second thoughts, without forethought, and in general without any thought whatsoever,
two become one.
Disinterestedness is forbidden: to give oneself for the sake of what is most
beautiful--for the satisfaction of one's own lust, this is one's only interest. True
disinterestedness would be the satisfaction of someone else's lust without any concern
for one's own. But then this disinterestedness could also be explained as interested:
your lust consists in the satisfaction of someone else's. So in the end, lust for lust--this
is the most disinterested possible, insofar as the exchange is equal.
However, complete interestedness is also forbidden--giving oneself for money
alone, without any lust.
Of incentives for fornicating, the two extremes are forbidden: for passion or
money alone. For this reason, both passion and money are labeled dirty.
Not surprisingly, women strive for the ideal: to give themselves out of lust and
to get money for it. But lust disappears, while money remains. This is why "diamonds
are a girl's best friend."[24]
People are shocked not so much by the fact that women give themselves to
men for compensation, for that happens everywhere like it or not, but that it happens
in an instant, without rituals, ceremonies, or courtship. Here's the money and there's
the body. It happens too fast for our sluggish moral codes, occupied with putting on
the brakes and delaying the gratification of desire.
This is perhaps what annoys society more than anything--the immediacy of the
exchange of money for sex. This is the fundamental "evil" that is labeled prostitution.
So here I have come up with an exhaustive (?) definition, for, as you can see
for yourselves, it turns out to be universal (?), leaving out only the rarest exceptions
(!). So then, if a woman fornicates with a man for reasons other than her own personal
enjoyment, she begins to be called a prostitute. Even if she receives enormous
pleasure, but takes money for it or is given some kind of recompense from the man
over and above her own pleasure, she is called a prostitute. Accordingly, a proper
woman is one who fornicates for the sake of pleasure alone. But for any given woman,
such cases are isolated. Therefore, a woman occupies a state of "propriety" for only a
very short period of time, either because pleasure alone is no longer enough for her or
because she doesn't always experience pleasure. And so, a number of men are not
playing their part in the defining the prostitute. Women live most of their lives as
prostitutes because they are governed by other incentives to copulate above and
beyond pleasure.
If we were to take even such an innocent example as that of a wife who gives
herself to her husband without experiencing pleasure herself, she would appear as a
typical prostitute, for she is governed by such thoughts as keeping her husband
satisfied or keeping peace in the home.
Even a wife who has experienced pleasure does not forget that her husband
keeps her or that she needs him for something other than sexual pleasure: tomorrow
she'll need him to hammer a nail or to buy her a dress.
The virgin who decides to give herself to a suitor for the first time so as not to
lose him, immediately becomes a prostitute.
Only a man and a woman, who catch sight of one another at an orgy, are
immediately enflamed with passion, and begin immediately to fornicate--in this
situation, the woman is observing propriety.
However, as a consequence of her natural station, a woman is obliged to take
into consideration her future progeny, which means that she will almost always be
evaluating the social qualities of her partner, so that every woman according to her
nature cannot avoid being a prostitute. And if, as a result of the ubiquity and
universality of prostitution among women, it should be legal, it should also be
encouraged as a manifestation of a woman's maternal instinct to protect and bring up
her offspring. As paradoxical as it may appear, prostitution owes its existence to the
maternal instinct.
A woman is also "proper" when she is masturbating all alone. Then she
receives only pleasure and no other benefit than orgasm. Propriety in this context
appears as egoism, flight from society, immersion in oneself. Whereas prostitution is a
socially useful activity for a woman.
The refusal to concede the primordial whorishness of women goes against the
laws of nature against which all idealistic societies beat their heads.
It was not long ago in America that breast feeding was considered unnecessary
for children, which sprang from men's disgust and fear of mother's milk and the
woman's breast. The model was the woman who did not breast-feed, flouting her
nature to the detriment of her child. A society that had gone astray raised this woman
up as an example. Now people have thought it over and now even allow women to
breast feed in public, finally acknowledging that her breast, her milk, are an essential
part of a woman and of her relationship with her child. Prostitution, like breasts and
milk, is essential to women. This must be acknowledged and prostitution allowed to
blossom and grow for the benefit of all.
Society is ponderous, built on sluggishness and inertia. It is shocked and
envious over the quick reactions of its individual members, capable of agreeing in the
blink of an eye to fornicate for money. While society has constructed labyrinths and
dams against its members' sexual urgings.
Society wants a man and a woman to work a bit, to row a while in the social
galley, before a man receives and a woman grants access to her orifices. Society
requires that a man and a woman pass through a courtship and seduction ceremony,
but when money facilitates insanities coupling, society is unable to assess a social tax
in the form of sexual frustration on the couple. For when people are not sexually
satisfied, society has the opportunity to steal a part of their energy for its needs.
However, such a society is near-sighted in its calculations, for the satisfaction of
sexual desires by means of legal and abundant prostitution increases their rate of
growth, just as physical training increases muscles. And society begins to acquire the
energy it needs not from the stagnant swamp of repressed energy created from the
suppression of prostitution, but from the powerful flow of energy renewed and
expanded thanks to the efforts of prostitutes.
If women enjoy only rare periods of "propriety" and live in an almost constant
state of whorishness, this is reversed in men, for according to the definition made for
women, a man is "proper" by nature, insofar as he inclined to support exclusively
pleasurable relations with a woman for no money, without thinking and without
responsibility over a long period of time. A woman either breaks off those relations or
turns them into prostitution for the man as well as herself. But that's another story.
The breadth of my definition exudes the vague aroma of an identity: "Women
are prostitutes," which is inconvenient despite being justified, insofar as society
artificially fashions from that identity its most visible category of behavior. Therefore,
for the continuation of our discussion, we will adapt ourselves to the ludicrous
prejudices of the obvious: a single act of fornication, performed without hesitation for
money, will be labeled prostitution.
There are theoretical definitions necessary for debate and strategy. There are
also practical definitions necessary for summarizing and tactics. However, it's the last
definition provided that we will use for... discussion below. Again there's a
contradiction. But it's a productive one.
Why Young Men Need Prostitutes
For youths, who still have not learned how to skillfully command their own
bodies, who experience fear and embarrassment before themselves and their as yet
untested sexual capabilities, who still do not know the subtleties of a woman's body
and soul, who have no experience in the art of seduction--the prostitute is necessary
and useful. She can show them what they need to now without shame; she can tell
them without hesitation; she can indulge them without limits. The prostitute is a
teacher, skilled and accessible, for trials without errors. Or, shall we say, with a
minimum of errors.
If there were no prejudices against prostitutes, they could show youths various
methods of love-making, teach them means of preventing pregnancy and venereal
disease, answer the inevitable questions about the anatomy and physiology of the
sexes.[25]
Youths, and even more so boys, have a problem, as a rule, getting a hold of
money. And so parents should help them out and give them money for prostitutes.
There is nothing reprehensible in this--young people are sent to school to learn and
this is just a continuation of their studies. Just as parents approve of their son's fiancée,
so should they carefully approve of his first woman, aiming for the most capable and
beautiful prostitute.
A professional prostitute is a guarantee that one's first sexual experience will
be a happy one. One's first experience leaves its mark on one's entire life--sexual and
other. If a youth comes out of it satisfied, confident, having found respect and love
rather than shame and disgust for his body and for that of his female partner, then
society will be composed of people inclined toward love, not cruelty.
In order for this guarantee to be valid, one must assure a high degree of
professionalism among prostitutes. They should take an exam like a doctor, although
more practical and less scientific and theoretical, to license not only their healthy
bodies but their skills. Apprentices should work under the guidance of professional
prostitutes, and their price should be lower than for those who are licensed. Here, one
will say: "Give me a young beauty who isn't licensed and who's cheaper than a highpriced old hag with a stack of certificates." And this is the truth. So let's chuck this
idea. But skill and professionalism should be valued not only individually--with a big
tip--but by society as a whole.
Why the Lonely Need Prostitutes
Whether you're young or old, "loneliness is a horrible business," as I wrote
once in a poem. Practically and philosophically, prostitutes "remove" loneliness.
You'll say that it's just for a moment. But isn't life itself but a moment? Take a dozen
prostitutes and that's twelve moments. String out these moments for days and months
and you'll see that loneliness will be gone and only as much will remain as you want.
Or more accurately, only as much as you pay for.
A prostitute of the geisha variety can comfort a man in every way. She is able
to take care of intellectual hunger no worse than sexual hunger.
As it is practiced in the East, one could sign a contract to live together for a
year. With the option to cancel after a month if it doesn't work out. If we have
specialists who can talk someone out of committing suicide, we should have
specialists who can talk someone out of loneliness, and, if they can't talk him out of it,
they can at least distract him with their talk. Caressing him all the while.
It is obvious that loneliness can well up at any age and in any situation.
Loneliness is universal. So, too, is the medicine, the panacea: a fresh, available
body.
Why Married Men Need Prostitutes
If sex in marriage gradually loses its importance and often disappears
altogether, then cheating on your spouse is not such a detrimental blow. What is
important in such a situation is not sex, but what is called fidelity, that is, the total
absence of sex--the idea that your spouse is not sleeping with anyone else. And so,
under the pretext of fidelity, a man and a woman in their growing indifference toward
one another must resign themselves to indifference toward life. Or, more accurately,
to hatred of life. Insofar as regular carnal relations are a major indication of love of
life, in their absence, life holds no joy.
But this is a rough patch for the couple, for it undoes the bonds of marriage.
Note, it undoes them, it does not sever them. Marriage ceases to be a burdensome
yoke as soon as prostitute-angles are sent to a husband from heaven above.
Like an alcoholic who boasts of his respectability because he supports his
habit not with money from his paycheck but only from his bonuses, a worthy husband
can shower praise on himself because he pays for prostitutes out of his Christmas
bonus. It would be even better, of course, to have enough money to give a prostitute
not a measly ten dollar bill, but a fistful of hundreds without batting an eye, so that
she'd spread herself out joyfully and for hours on end. Ah, dreamer...
Monogamy fears more than anything else the free exchange of information
that would make the obvious to all the sickly state of monogamy. For this reason the
Institute of Marriage (which, like all institutes in Russia, has probably already been renamed the University of Marriage or the Academy of Marriage) has come out strongly
against prostitution as offering options with which monogamy is in no position to
compete.
Casual sex: this is not sex with whomever's at hand in the immediacy of lust,
as is usually thought. It is sex in marriage that has become routine, ordinary, boring,
that is casual. The Joy of Sex has its place outside of marriage, with a prostitute who
is longed for, skilled, and ready for anything.
In marriage, spouses struggle in vain to prolong passion, but achieve only
extended obligations. And here, out of the blue comes the prostitute.
The constant cunt of one's wife lends married life certainty, while the variable
cunts of prostitutes lend married life richness.
Young women, as a rule, don't like to sleep with married men, as married men
are insolvent--their ability to pay for a screw with marriage has already been
squandered on another woman. Just as birds are banded in order to track their
migration, people are banded in order to track their sexual life. A girl's first glance at a
man is directed at his hand--is he wearing a wedding band?
Prostitutes, on the other hand prefer married men--it's less likely that they'll
have a venereal disease (it would show up immediately in their wives), and in general
they're less dangerous than single men. So it's worth getting married just to get
preferential treatment from your prostitutes.
Fulfilling one's "conjugal duties" is linked to the momentary spreading of
wifely legs at the husband's demand. When men complain about a wife's failure to
fulfill her "conjugal duties," they don't have in mind her care for, devotion to, or
running of the home. It would be best for a prostitute to fulfill a wife's "conjugal
duties."
The castration of men has been and still is achieved by Christianity with the
help of the institution of marriage. On the one hand, in marriage desire croaks very
soon, which serves the purposes of Christianity. On the other hand, variety was
forbidden: Various clergymen have frightened us and continue to frighten us with the
commandment "Thou shalt not commit adultery!" while they themselves are quietly
rubbing their hands at the thought of standing over a prostitute. Man has long been
fenced in by marriage, in which he is emasculated and nothing fresh is allowed to
enter. This is in theory, which, fortunately, is never supported by materialist or moral
praxis.
Although morality is no longer sufficient to maintain monogamy, people today
are attempting to bolster it with the deadly threat of AIDS. Marriage protects one from
AIDS just as a castle once protected people from the plague. But there's no feast, only
a restrictive diet. Prostitutes, however, who act professionally and refuse to be touched
by anyone not wearing a condom, let the sterilized feast go on.
Every married man sooner or later (and usually sooner) tires of his wife and
desires other women. The absence of available and beautiful prostitutes forces men
either into compulsory fidelity with a screw every month or so, and emasculation, or
into a long term seduction involving the loss of a great deal of time and money to
support an affair with another man's wife or with some lonely woman, hoping to
become a wife. Such intrigues tear a husband from his wife, and a father from his
children, threatening to destroy a family under the profound pretext, expressed by a
husband to his wife: "I don't love you anymore."
But that is all quickly resolved with a prostitute--every husband, even one who isn't
panting for an extramarital affair, can let off steam quickly, enjoyably, and safely,
while remaining a model husband and father.
In this way, prostitutes keep families together, which brings stability to a
society that is founded on the fucking nuclear family. This argument has been torn to
shreds over the centuries, but contemporary society keeps its members in ignorance; it
is silent about the past, and people are lazy as a rule. It is easier for them to agree with
some mealy-mouthed pastor than to entertain doubts and to dig around in history
books. This is why I go about educating right and left.
People will say, and what about the wife? Should she also take a lover? Or hire
a male prostitute? To which I answer: These are questions that women must ask
themselves and must resolve for themselves. Although they've been resolved long ago.
Monogamy is when you put all your balls in one basket.
Why the Poor Need Prostitutes
A lack of money means a lack of women. It's not for nothing that the words
"indigence" and "indignant" come from the same root. How can things be arranged so
that anyone can afford a good prostitute? A poor prostitute for a poor man. A
middleclass prostitute for a middleclass man. A rich prostitute for a rich man. It's
possible to move to another group when circumstances permit. But they rarely permit.
It is not at all necessary that a poor prostitute be dirty or drunk or strung out on
drugs. There are poor women who are tidy and sweet, who work for pennies at some
idiotic factory or as a cashier. Why wouldn't they give themselves for these pennies,
capable at the same time of earning a good deal more? In the factory they earn five
dollars an hour, while as a prostitute they could earn five dollars for a five-minute
blowjob from a poor man. Any poor man can scrape together that sum. Of course,
cheap prostitutes will want to make a career for themselves and earn two hundred
dollars for those same five minutes. Let them, if it works out. But not all women are
careerists. There are those who toil most of their lives for minimum wage, though
with great dignity and pride, but then they don't practice prostitution. So there would
be prostitutes who would work for minimum wage, but despite that would be content
and proud, not anxious to make a career. Prostitution is great because it doesn't have
to be one's only occupation in life. One can combine jobs. Society should help these
women and to send them men so that they can make more money and free themselves
from the humiliation of low-paid work.
This problem has been solved in the East where young girls have from time
immemorial earned the money for their dowries through prostitution and this was
considered normal.
But in Western society, this isn't profitable--who would perform the plentiful,
unskilled, low-paid work? It turns out that no good would come to society from a
woman if she were to become self-sufficient: a cheap, almost free labor force would
slip through society's fingers. This is what society drills into women, so that they are
insulted when offered money for spreading their legs or opening their mouth. They
would sooner agree to sell themselves into slave labor than to work from time to time
as a prostitute. If it is not immoral for a woman to waste her life carrying out some
meaningless, monotonous work, then how can you call prostitution immoral. What is
immoral is not that a woman earns money with her body, but that in general she is
required to earn money!
Simone de Beauvoir said and it seems appropriate here: "It is often asked: why
does she choose it (prostitution)? The question is, rather: why has she not chosen
it?”[26]
Society arms itself first and foremost against cheap prostitutes. Society cannot
accept the fact that a prostitute can give away so cheaply that for which society exacts
so high a price: one's life (thrown away in marriage). The price--that's what enrages
society. The bargain-basement prices of the cheap prostitute undermine the
ideological economy. Society treats expensive prostitutes with significantly more
condescension. And in general, the more money a woman takes, the closer she comes,
in society's understanding, to being "proper."
Moreover, cheap prostitutes are the daily bread of poor men. And just as there
are free meals for the poor, there should be volunteer prostitutes who give themselves
for free to the poor and indigent, and the corresponding recompense should be
subtracted from her earnings as a charitable tax deduction.
The police, however, drive away and arrest mostly street prostitutes, the
cheapest kind, and in so doing deprive primarily the poorest men of their pleasure.
Why Old Men Need Prostitutes
There should be many Susannahs for every elder. That's the right combination.
And from time immemorial there has been only one Susannah and bunches of elders-it takes an entire team of men to keep watch on a single woman.
As for the money, what a relief it is to think that in old age, when you're ugly
and infirm, you'll be able to purchase hire prostitutes, young and available, who will
indulge you. And so that "young and unknown tribe" will feel my "hello" in their
deepest depths.
It has now been established scientifically that old people need sex, too. And so
they invented Viagra. But even without it, even if you don't have a hard on, you still
want sex--there is no life without sex. So either you eat yourself up inside, or you give
vent to your feelings. Or both at the same time. And age means nothing here. It's
really just that in our youth we can do it time and time again, while in old age we can
do it again only after a time.
An infant masturbates in its mother's womb--it's actually been filmed, so
there's nothing for the moralists to say. And an old man wants, not an old woman, but
a young woman. He needs her even more than a young man needs a young woman.
For a young man, a young woman is the obvious choice; he is filled with youth and a
young woman merely confirms that. But an old man has been deprived of youth.
Rudely, irrevocably, unavoidably. A young woman for him is not just a screw, she's
rejuvenating, a connection to youth. That is to say, an elixir. Having taken a young
woman and disgorged inside her his already meager seed, he feels himself--for an
instant--young again. Where can he find this elixir? Well, an eighteen-year old girl
took a bite out of the elderly Goethe's apple, and we still don't know how much he
paid for that. And the jailor's daughter tempted the elderly Marquis de Sade. That
most likely did not take place without the exchange of many francs. But what has a
mere elderly mortal to tempt a young maiden? She can only be a prostitute, all honor
and praise to her! She is an old man's savior, his last love and hope. This is why old
people need money so!
An extra sum should be included in an old man's social security check to cover
the cost of prostitutes. This increase in social security will be economically beneficial
for the state, for, by screwing regularly, the elderly will be healthier and health care
costs will go down. Science has again thoughtfully concluded that an active sex life
increases life expectancy and improves health improves. Thanks a lot for proving once
again that two times two is four.
The prostitute should feel the importance of her profession and take pride in
the fact that she is giving the elderly that which no other woman wants to give them,
and is, in this way, beautifying the last years of their lives.
Why the Sick and Deformed Need Prostitutes
The deformed, but wealthy Toulouse Lautrec lived in a brothel -- he wanted to
be surrounded by love. And he was. How could he have survived without prostitutes?
And now with important and decorous airs, we display in our museums Lautrec's
representations of those women whom society has censured.
What good is youth even, if one is sick or deformed? Broads don't flutter
around you; they avoid you or simply run away at your approach. Any decent woman
who dreams of getting married and having children will not only not give herself to
you, she will recoil. Where can you try a cunt, how do you get hold of a body? Shell
out a few bucks. Beautiful women will come for money and force you to forget about
your illness and your crooked spine. You'll feel handsome when your desires are
indulged by a beautiful woman. You will forget your infirmities for a delicious
moment. This is true happiness for the sick and deformed!
The deformed could never have sex with a beautiful woman. It is only thanks
to a beautiful prostitute that this becomes possible. Prostitution allows the deformed
and the infirm to connect not only with pleasure, but also with beauty.
Why Every Man Needs a Prostitute
Yes, every man.
Men are like convicts who wear a ball and chain to keep them from running
away. Every man has two balls that are his ball and chain, keeping him from running
away from his desire. And those who intellectualize about the unfortunate state of
man, subjected to inescapable and fatiguing desires, shouldn't whine, they should
satisfy those desires and in the first instance with the help of a prostitute. And if you
don't like your desires, go and hang yourself, because you'll never succeed in
suppressing them. Suppress them and you'll go off your rocker. You'll be going to war
against prostitutes, you fool.
Of course, like ants, human beings can divided into soldiers, housekeepers and
scholars. There are those who are born for screwing and there are those who content
themselves with their wives and bury themselves in the imaginary work of science,
business, etc. But for those who are rewarded/burdened with desire, screwing is their
life's work. If a prostitute screws to earn money, the screwer earns money to hire
prostitutes.
You have to pay for everything--everyone knows that. It should also be
common knowledge that a woman pays with her body and a man with money. In such
a situation, there is one goal--to make as much money as possible for the insemination
of as many women as possible. Insemination that will be prevented by means of
contraception.
But even the non-screwer will feel the need for another cunt from time to time.
It is more difficult and takes longer for him, not being a professional, but a pathetic,
flaccid lover, to achieve the desired result with a "proper" woman, who is clearly
oriented toward rough handling. For this reason, a prostitute represents for the non-
screwer the simplest solution to his problem, which is not one of quantity, as it is for
the screwer, but one of quality, of how to free himself from his desire, without
torturing himself.
Every normal man has a current woman, that is, a woman of the moment.
Against that backdrop, the prostitute sparkles.
The prostitute in truth liberates man from the yoke of those social obligations
that society places on sexual relations. This liberation, however, is conditional, for it is
necessary to get a hold of some money, to make a living--that is, society forces you to
break your back all the same. It also forces you to sweat for food and housing, but to
make up for it, there isn't the double oppression that occurs when prostitution is
forbidden: first, earn money, but don't you dare spend it on a women, instead work
some more, and, in order to get her to agree to go to bed with you, don't put the money
in her hand, instead, buy her presents and grub so that all these purchases will grow
the economy and, in this mediated fashion, you'll win yourself the woman.
But, on the other hand, if you give the money directly to the woman, then she
can buy her own gifts and grub and grow the economy. However... the woman won't
experience the emotional satisfaction of knowing that she is so loved that she has been
showered with gifts. But on the other hand, the man will experience emotionalphysical satisfaction after shooting. However, the joy of men is sterile, while the joy
of women leads not only to children but also to stability.
Innovation in sex often becomes more important than beauty, or more
accurately, innovation itself becomes beauty. The prostitute therefore represents
aesthetic pleasure as well.
One day you live with one woman, the next day with another, but not just
screwing, but as factually living with her. Every woman cares for you in her own way,
talks in her own way, and creates her own kind of life for you. One kind of woman
bores you, so you switch you for another. This is how a variety of lifestyles is
produced.
One of the most wonderful feelings is when you're screwing one beautiful
woman and you know that tomorrow you'll be screwing another beautiful woman.
All these fantasies are fulfilled either by youth or by money.
What could be more spiritual than screwing, for the majority of people spend
far less time doing it than they do thinking and dreaming of it. And thought and
dreams are what a spiritual life is made of. Insofar as the prostitute is a refined symbol
of pure screwing, then it is namely the prostitute who provides spiritual sustenance to
men. Until he saves up enough money to buy her services.
In order to rid yourself of passion for your lover--marry her. In order to rid
yourself of passion for a prostitute--hire her.
In hiring a prostitute, a man, looking for immediate gratification, pays off the
traditional female demands on the life of men. He says: "Here's the money and an
hour of my time. You won't get anything more. Now give me your body."
The prostitute, taking money from the man and giving him herself in
exchange, agrees not to encroach on his future, but to disappear without a trace.
Good service imitates love and caring. But for those services, one must pay
with money. But then imitation for money often turns out to be better than the original
for no dough.
The relationship of a man to a prostitute is an illustration of his relationship to
sex itself--wild desire at first followed by complete indifference. For this reason, a
woman tries with all her might to ensnare a man from all sides, besides sex, for in sex
she can't go any further than orgasm.
The greatest primordial tragedy for man is that he can not screw all women,
for it is his genetically programmed task to inseminate as many females as possible in
order to disseminate his genes. Woman's tragedy stems from her task of sleeping with
all men at the same time so that their sperm in her vagina might be sown successfully,
triumphing over all the other spermatozoa that impregnate her ovules. Prostitution is
therefore one of the forced illusory ways in which men and women approach the
unattainable goals nature has set for them.
As with every tragedy, this one is derided in folklore: "You can't screw all the
women, but you've got to try."
One of the socially useful tasks performed by the prostitute is to divert toward
themselves the constant surplus energy of men and to make sure that the volleys of
sperm fired off by them are blanks.
A predator views any passing herd of animals as potential food. Similarly, a
man views every passing woman as potential pleasure. But he doesn't have the guts to
take every healthy and strong woman. He can only have the very young or the very
old, or those crippled by loneliness. Only when he's walking down a street of
prostitutes does he feel himself to be a real predator, crunching the banknotes in his
pocket.
Man's struggle against prostitution is one form of Christian self-laceration,
performed by men on themselves.
The from January to December Theses:
A prostitute in one's youth is a teacher.
A prostitute in old age is a comfort.
A prostitute in middle age is a re-birth.
A prostitute for the damaged is a sister of charity.
A prostitute cures one of shame and confusion.
A prostitute renders first aid in the continually occurring incidents of
loneliness. And not only first aid, but second, third... tenth...
A prostitute is the embodiment of democracy: she denies no one; for her, all
men who can pay are equal.
A prostitute is Sacred Lust.
And for every man, a prostitute is a Savior.
The Prostitute and the "Proper" Woman
Our most just society, blessed by Jesus Christ, gives it approval only to a lifelong contract with a woman with the indispensable vow that it last for one's entire life.
This contract can be cancelled through divorce, but then people lie again and enter
into another contract, this time for sure until death, etc. Why not conclude a contract
for a year, six months, one month? That could be renewed by mutual consent?
And even more wonderful: a contract for a day or an hour. Without renewal.
The same contracts with the same obligations, only for different periods of
time. Why is a contract for a day worse than a contract for life? Society wants to grab
each and every one of us by the throat and hold on until death.
There's the same kind of contract with a prostitute: I'm going to spend this
much time with you, you're going to do such and such and I will do such and such,
and you'll receive the following sum for fulfilling your obligations.
People often sign marriage contracts or pre-nuptial agreements, but even
without them the marriage ceremony is nothing other than a contract, according to
which the participants obligate themselves to love one another and to care for one
another in sickness and in health. For such a price, one could give oneself away
without a ceremony. Moreover, many wives don't stop negotiating even after signing
the marriage contract; they continue to haggle over additional services in return for
fulfilling their conjugal duties, which were already included in the marriage contract.
This is like a stupid prostitute, having already negotiated everything with you and
taken your money, who begins to act capricious and demand additional payment. At
which point, you send her packing and take another. With a wife, it's not so simple.
But in this situation, too, a prostitute saves you from your wife, who has
overestimated her market value.
Demosthenes divided women into three types: hetaeras for pleasure,
concubines for everyday needs, and wives for producing legal offspring and running
the household.[27]
This classification has remained essentially valid, only the words hetaera and
concubine have fallen out of use. The functions of the wife have not changed. The role
of the hetaera is now performed by refined lovers and prostitutes, while the
concubines are those who screw for nothing. Only what seems to be "nothing" turns
out to be payment of a different kind, either in the form of venereal disease or
unwanted pregnancy or demands for attention, more than the man wants to give, and
other complaints. Again, it's the prostitute that saves men from all that.
Relating to a woman as to a cunt, an ass, breasts, and a mouth is not cynical at
all. To the contrary, it is idealistic, insofar as it produces a separation of the Idea of
pleasure from the indigestible female mix of the material and the ideal. Just as we
idealize the body builder for the size of his muscles, which doesn't humiliate him, but
rather makes him into the embodiment of physical beauty and strength, ignoring his
other qualities, which are unimportant to the Idea. To view a woman, taking into
account all her wonderful and disgusting aspects together, which is referred to as the
objective approach, is the apotheosis of cynicism, for this view is cold; it seeks
statistical balance, fairness devoid of passion. On the other hand, a lofty view of
woman idealizes her. However, it is not only her eyes or her shapely figure that can be
idealized, but also her breasts and even her cunt. The most wonderful idealization of
woman is as a source of pleasure. That is an idealization is obvious insofar as a
woman is, alas, a source of more than just pleasure. The prostitute, as a continually
gushing and open source of pleasure, is therefore an example of the highest
idealization of woman.
Shame is the remote control by which the State rules us from afar. An
individual may be in his own home, behind locked doors, but shame still rules him
and doesn't let him forget about the State. Many people are ashamed of nudity, and
women are embarrassed to look at their cunts in a mirror to see just what it is they
have between their legs and what "it" looks like.
One old woman (and there are gazillions like her) confessed that when she was
a girl an adult neighbor regularly invited her to his home and fondled her genitals.
And to this day the old woman is racked by shame over the fact that she found it
pleasant and would run over to the neighbor's house of her own accord for her dose of
pleasure. Shame is like an electrode that has been planted in our brains by
Christianity, through which society is able to discharge deadly shocks that prevent an
individual from taking joy in pleasure.
And if an individual is somehow able to forget shame for a certain amount of
time, then the State sniffs it out, becomes indignant, and declares this absence of
shame to be shameless, that is, a crime.
The prostitute is a creature who is summoned to neutralize shame and instill
pleasure.
It is considered improper for a woman to go to bed with a man the first time
they meet, because, for a woman who doesn't demand any money up front, this is not
enough time to negotiate long-term, non-monetary payment. If a woman nevertheless
jumps into bed on a first date out of lust, that is, without payment of any kind, then
society, which, like a pimp, doesn't allow screwing for pleasure alone, soon forces the
woman to give herself for long-term obligations that her partner would have to
assume. Society inculcates her with shame, and self-doubt so that she demands the
highest price for screwing: marriage.
In former times, there were societies where a bride and groom saw each other
for the first time on their wedding day, the marriage having been arranged by their
parents. So then, the bride and groom screwed on their first date. If there's a wedding,
then it's okay. But this occurs because the wedding guarantees financial payment for
sexual relations.
Nowadays a "proper" woman must secure from a man all kinds of financial
support and his commitment to the relationship, which is impossible to do on a first
date and so a woman will drag things out until she is convinced that he has the
financial and other means necessary to support their relationship. The prostitute, like a
bride in an arranged marriage, gives herself immediately because the money is
guaranteed, like the obligatory financial support in marriage.
A cheap slut is a woman who sells herself "on the cheap." While those women
who sell themselves for a lot of money are called wealthy and proper. The price
determines a woman's respectability. The woman who can fleece a man out of the
maximum (marriage) is the winner.
And no one criticizes the winner.
Before, a woman did not give out before marriage and in this way she kept her
men on a leash. Nowadays, a woman gives out before marriage but on condition that
he'll marry her in the end, or else she'll stop giving out. Before men were trained
through hunger, now they're trained with treats, creating a dependency.
Every compliment paid a woman can be translated as: "Let's screw!"
Every reaction by a woman to a compliment can be translated as: "How much
will you pay?"
Women's phraseology regarding their inaccessibility is no more than the
jargon of street vendors.
A matchmaker is for proper young ladies and women. A procuress is for
prostitutes.
Every matchmaker can work as a procuress. Every procuress can work as a
matchmaker.
O, how I'd like to complete the syllogism!
If a woman sells her body for money, then a man sells his soul for money. In
this sense, a woman is more moral than a man, for she sells only material, perishable
goods, while he sells that which is sacred. A woman's soul is protected by her ability
to be indifferent during sex.
A woman's pride consists in her ability to keep her legs together. A proper
woman doesn't do that unless she is courted, while a prostitute doesn't do that unless
she's given money for it.
Prostitutes demand money, while proper women demand respect, which along
the circuitous paths of morality leads to money all the same.
A cunt is open to every man and so one cannot accuse it of infidelity. And so if
you love cunts and not the women who are playing dirty tricks with them, then you
will not know jealousy. Love prostitutes!
Speculation is the acquisition of something at a low price in order to resell it at
a higher one. Isn't the behavior of "proper" women wholesale speculation, while the
behavior of prostitutes is retail speculation? Simone de Beauvoir said the same thing
in somewhat different words.[28]
Every woman is given by God a thing of great value: a cunt, the price of which
is driven higher and higher by society with the help of shame and prohibition. A
virgin's cunt is priced the highest, and a young lady is trained to sell it in exchange for
marriage--a wholesale trade, for only before being deflowered is a wholesale approach
to her body possible. Upon losing her virginity, a woman enters the retail market, but
all the same tries to sell herself wholesale, for the maximum amount in exchange for
marriage, although that becomes more and more difficult due to the temptations that
arise in the retail market. Having learned of the possibility of repeated re-sale of her
cunt, which she acquired at no cost, for a lot of money and benefits, a woman begins
to speculate, which becomes for the majority of women the only means of existence.
The absence of speculation would be one case in which a cunt, bestowed on a woman
by God at no cost, was also given for free. However, a woman, sensing the demand of
the market and her own material needs, makes every effort to sell herself at the
highest price, and in order to do that, she makes herself as attractive as possible,
embellishing her commodity with the help of cosmetics, spurring on the stallions by
feigning to be inaccessible (in short supply).
Prostitutes, on the other hand, gamble on the advantages of retail trade as
compared to wholesale. And so, no matter how much a prostitute sells herself, her
goods will never decrease. And when pregnant, she increases even more.
There are only three ways to treat a woman: approach her, introduce yourself
and begin a decorous conversation that will gradually lead her to bed, or approach her
and take hold of her, and if she dares to protest, take her by force. The second variant
is the most natural. The third and most beneficial variant is with a prostitute: approach
her, pay her fee and take her. I saw, I paid, I conquered. Money makes everyone into a
Caesar, that is, a “seize her.”
“Lick your lips,” says the photographer when he’s photographing a face.
“Moisten your lips,” says the photographer when he’s photographing a cunt.
Wetness is always more attractive than dryness. Wetness is associated with
desire. Dryness-with indifference. This is why “proper” women in advertisements
always campaign for dryness. While wetness is associated with dirt, and so prostitutes
are called dirty.
Proper women in high heels are on a pedestal so that they look like goddesses
of beauty and appear unattainable, higher than they are in reality.
The prostitute in high heels is like someone on tiptoe, trying to make herself
visible.
The word “love” is often used to justify screwing outside of marriage. Love is
not the same as sexual relations; it is the condition for initiating and continuing those
relations. The “proper” woman demands that love be the payment, which must come
first, as with a prostitute, before sexual relations can begin. Then what is love in such
a situation? They always hit the wall when it comes to define what "love" means. But
we all know that "love" assumes an intention to marry soon, which produces in a
woman the certainty that both before and after fornicating she will receive payment in
the form of presents, flowers, courtship, that is, caring. In place of money, clean and
simple, we have a dirty, white-washed concept of love, which, of course, includes
money.
For a man to inspire love in a woman means to be able to screw her for no charge. For
a woman to inspire love in a man means to pump out from him her means of
existence.
While the church tries to separate itself from prostitution, the religious channel on
television may now find itself right next to a channel that shows prostitutes talking
about their profession. The technical ease with which opposites can now be brought
together only strengthens one faith in the power of science, which in the end removes
the cataract of Christianity from our eyes, opening them once again to the religious
nature of prostitution.
Truth is desire. A lie is the concealment, withholding, or imitation of that
desire. Proper women lie by concealing or withholding their desire. The prostitute lies
by imitating desire. But at least with her lie, the prostitute makes things enjoyable for
her client. While a "proper" woman, by concealing and withholding her desire, that is,
by lying, drives up her price and in this way deceives her client, i.e., a man.
The story of "Beauty and the Beast" once again demonstrates the ability of
women to trample on the aesthetic in the name of the practical. (By the way, this is the
main reason there are so few female composers and mathematicians of genius, for this
demands the greatest possible distance from "practical" considerations.) A woman
will agree to sleep with anyone who promises her attention and care. This proves the
genetic mercenariness of the female of the species. And the fact that the beast is
turned into a handsome prince when he is able to possess a woman's body only
confirms that a woman can suppress her desire for beauty, but not kill it entirely,
secretly dreaming of a handsome partner (this is why you still find among women
talented poets, writers, artists).
The beauty would surely cheat on the beast sooner or later and, in order to
drum this instructive idyll into the head of the folk about the possibility of eternal
love, the beast is hastily changed into a handsome prince. In this way, the woman gets
everything she wants: money, care, love and beauty.
For screwing, a woman looks for a handsome man; for marriage, the last thing
she thinks of is male beauty. In fact, she prefers an unattractive man that other women
won't be throwing themselves at. In this way, she avoids competition in marriage, in
which the wife (as every woman knows) necessarily loses to the other woman, who
encroaches on her husband's seed.
Stupid women are a chatterboxes. A woman shows herself to be a chatterbox
in her gestures as well, and they distinguish stupid prostitutes women of great
experience. An intelligent woman is taciturn in her words and gestures, and for this
reason does not make herself obvious, even if she's a prostitute.
"A cathedral is holy, only because religious services take place inside it." (my
verse). If we were to speak of a cunt as we do, for example, of an elbow, this would be
pornography, but if we were to speak of it as a place in which a mystery takes place,
then it becomes more than a piece of meat; it becomes divine. And such a
conversation arises whenever you're in the grip of desire.
Women treat beauty like something they slip into to make themselves more
attractive. Feminine aesthetics involves seduction through beauty and its sale.
Masculine aesthetics involves the admiration and possession of beauty. For
women beauty is a means. For men, it is the end.
In every profession there are masters and ordinary craftsmen, people who love
their profession and people who hate it, but who don't know how to find a different
use for it themselves. In every profession there are the talented and the talentless,
honest people and swindlers, peoples who strive for perfection and people who are
satisfied with what they have. And this is especially true in the profession of
prostitution.
However, just because there are doctors who are quacks, people don't
completely dismiss the medical profession and send all the sick to homoeopathists.
No, they continue to go to trustworthy, respectable doctors, although they use
homeopathic means to treat their married life.
A husband and wife without any children gets divorced. The wife is awarded a
great deal of alimony and the husband pays up. It would be the exact same situation if
he lived with a kept woman, to whom he pays money so that she would be available to
him at any time. And so, with this judicial ruling, a wife is officially made equal to a
kept woman.
A woman consists of tasty morsels that are kept behind the barbed wire of
manners, laws and conventions. A prostitute is a delicacy displayed on the counter,
standing in the street or driving in a car, and, what is most important, her price list is
in plain view.
What is referred to as the "romanticism" of women, which everyone finds so
moving, considering it an instance of selflessness and pure love, is, in fact, the clearest
expression of her mercenariness. With her inaccessibility, that is, her "romanticism,"
women are simply establishing the conditions of trade, demanding payment in the
form of greater attention (readiness to pay), gifts (actual payment), and proof that the
man possesses power, intelligence, and material means (a guarantee of continued
payment), etc. The process of courting is nothing less that the process of buying a
woman that consists of instilling in her a sense of comfort, which lets her know that
it's time to close the deal.
Men are "yes" people, women are "no" people. Men live according to the
principle of "yes" and women live according to the principle of "no". And only
prostitutes are equal to men in their constant "yes", but this is where the similarly
ends, for behind every "yes" there is a price.
In Russia, during the time when condoms were in short supply, one foreigner
paid a prostitute in condoms, just as a lover gives his beloved jewelry, which she will
use to seduce other men.
A young man is playing a romance on the guitar under the balcony of a
courtesan while she' screwing someone else. Then she comes out and throws the
singer a kerchief, wet with her latest excretions. The young singer is enraptured with
the gift and rushes into the house and presents her with a pearl necklace, while at that
very moment, her last lover is climbing down a rope from the balcony. The abletongued courtesan expresses her gratitude for the gift, when there is a knock at the
door. Her next client has arrived. The courtesan frightens the youth, telling him that
it's her husband, and then leads him onto the balcony where, now happy, he makes his
way down the rope. Well, what could be more romantic?
The generally accepted behavior of the "proper" woman is illustrated in a song
sung by Peggy Lee: "Get Me Some Money Like All Other Men Do."
A woman is always looking toward the future and determines along every step
of the way: is my relationship with my current lover serious or not, that is, will it lead
to marriage. If she thinks that it will, then her conscience is clean and she can screw
joyfully. If she concludes that the relationship is only about screwing, then, even if
she's in love with him, she will begin to suppress her love and to look for other
relationships that will lead to marriage. Translated into the familiar language of
prostitution, it turns out that if the man pays (in this case, with the hope of marriage,
which is the standard rate for most women), then she'll give herself to him. If he
doesn't pay, then bye-bye.
The baseness of "proper" women has nothing to do with the fact that their
propriety is based on prostitution, but that they so vehemently deny it.
It is dishonesty when you promise to do something and don't do it. Flirting is a
promise, it implants hope. A "proper" woman, who flirts promises but does not
deliver, and that's dishonest. With a prostitute, everything is extremely honest--she
does everything that has been agreed to and paid for.
Respect and love for a women must begin with one's mother and end with love
and respect for prostitutes. Precisely because they are the quintessence, the clearest
embodiment of everything female.
The greatest immorality in our society is screwing for money. The highest
form of morality is considered the taking of money without giving oneself that is,
flirting, accepting attention--most importantly--without entering into sexual relations.
Many women, sensing the immorality of this behavior and acknowledging the
obligations involved in relations of prostitution, refuse gives and invitations to
restaurants and other signs of attention from a man, with whom they do not intend to
enter a sexual relationship. This woman realizes that if she accepts an expensive
present from a man or a bunch of inexpensive ones, she is agreeing to sleep with him.
For such an honest, responsible woman, the question is not whether to act like a
prostitute or not, for that is not a choice. Rather, she must decide with whom to be a
prostitute.
Dishonest women who repudiate the natural contractual obligations between a
prostitute and her client, will accept gifts and things, but will not pay up. In Russia,
there were and are women who wrap men around their finger. They are invited to
restaurants and accept gifts, then they slip away. The act against the laws of nature
and so inspire particular hatred in men.
Such things occur at various levels and society even encourages them, for such
relationships decrease the amount of screwing and at the same time stimulate trade
(the guy pays, money goes into the Treasury), and that's all that society cares about.
All those models and actresses who take money for showing their barely
covered bits, strike seductive poses and keep men half-cocked at the thought of their
seeming accessibility. They take money from them--from the millions who see them
on the silver screen, on magazine covers and in magazine spreads--but they give
themselves to no one. In any case, they don't give themselves to any of those millions
who beat off over them. And such a woman--a highly moral wife or a loyal lover,
constructs her propriety and income on the expression: "You don't screw with your
eyes."
It is impossible not to take delight in the consistency of Muslims who, on the
one hand, permit polygamy, harems, and prostitution, admitting a man's desire for
variety, while, on the other hand, forbidding their women to show their faces, let
along their bodies. If you want to show your charms, then name your price in a place
that has been specially assigned place for such business.
Every woman is at her foundation a prostitute... And I am not using that word
in any way as an insult. The English language distinguished between a prostitute and
whore. (Russian also recognizes a distinction between "prostitutka" and "bliad'.")
A whore is a woman who likes to screw different guys for free, while a prostitute
takes money for it, but also likes it. Go and try to draw other distinctions.
In relationships that are more than one-night stands, and often even in onenight stands, a woman demand, as a rule, something more than orgasm--namely she
needs to feel that she and her present or future offspring are cared for. This is the
foundation stone of mercantile relations: a body for being taken care of, which in its
most overt form appears as money and in its less overt form as presents, an allowance,
marriage. All of this is biologically justified and can not be used to reproach a woman
for her immorality, for it is she and not the man who gives birth to children and cares
for them, which means, she needs to be cared for. Or get money. And most often,
both.
In essence, a woman does not in the end give herself to a man, as we are
accustomed to think, she sells herself or, to put it another way, she engages in barter:
she sets the conditions, that is what forms of support she will accept, in exchange for
making herself available.
Giving money is a shortcut, the simplest expression of support, and is not
beneficial to society, which represents itself as a trough, at which only the strong of
this world feed, that is to say, those who always take shortcuts. The masses must not
take shortcuts; they should roam about, or else they will have too much free time and,
just as in the army, if a soldier is left with nothing to do, morale will suffer. So let's go
and dig a trench of courtship, and then we'll fill it in with marriage, and then get
divorced and dig a new trench, expending money, time and your health in the process.
The message here is clear: do not change society; become the strong of this
world. (But not so fast.)
Incidentally, any attempt to change society is an attempt to become one of the
strong of this world in a society that has been changed by you.
Before it was thought that a proper woman should not experience pleasure
during intercourse, only indifference. If a woman experiences pleasure, then she is a
whore. Naturally, all women have secretly dreamt of being a whore. This was
specially done so as to fill the ranks of prostitutes.
If it is considered normal to sell your life on an hourly basis in the
manufacturing sector, then how can it be considered immoral to sell your body?
Moreover, the prostitute doesn't sell her body, she rents it for a certain length of time.
Slaves and wives sell themselves for their entire lives. Today divorce offers a vacation
for household slaves, that is, wives. But women return to slavery when they remarry.
Prostitution is only time-sharing.
For a prostitute, rape is when you're screwed for free.
Even for a proper woman rape can be considered as a free screw, for the man
fails to pay with attention, seduction, money and gifts.
The most insulting aspect of rape for a woman is that those who screw her
show utter contempt for the price list of morality.
Rape is unconditional screwing, in which the man has not concluded a trade
agreement; he simply takes what nature has provided: the orifices of the body. Rape is
the only form of fornication that does not involve prostitution (except for unthinking
fornication while in a state of mutual lust). Society punishes rapists for their rejection
of prostitution, for their failure to pay for screwing.
Why are women so indignant at the thought of gang banging, when a typical
prostitute can entertain twenty or more men a night? And day in and day out. She not
only survives, she experiences no physical discomfort. Moreover, it's better to sleep
with several men, who climax quickly and lubricate the vagina, than to sleep with one
dried out guy who could cause painful chafing. In any case, all that can be resolved
with the help of lubricated condoms.
Indignation at the thought of gang banging is due to the fact that when a
woman is raped by one man, she incurs damages, equal to those incurred from a single
client. But when she is raped by several men, these damages are multiplied by the
number of men in the group and the damages are so significant that they inspire
particular social indignation. (Theft on a particularly large scale.)
Rape accompanied by mutilation and rape without mutilation can not be
compared. The former involves bodily injury, for which the rapist must be punished,
regardless of whether the injury occurred during the rape or while struggling. The
latter involves a sexual act. For this reason, rape requires at least three men working
together--first, their combined strength will make it possible to avoid unnecessary
bodily injury to the woman, whereas, with a single rapist, it's often necessary to cause
the victim pain in order to stifle her protest. Three men can hold a woman without
causing her pain while preventing her from getting away. Moreover, if the three men
are capable and caring, they will certainly be able to physically satisfy the woman, for
at first she may be so frightened that she won't be in the mood and one man will
climax quickly, before bringing her to orgasm. However, when the first two warm her
up, she will easily climax with the third. And the whole time, they must calm her,
assuring her that it won't be painful and that it would be best for her to relax. In
addition, the woman's eyes should be covered before she gets a look at the rapists, so
that if the rapists do not correspond to her aesthetic standards, that won't prevent her
from concentrating on the physical sensations occurring between her "holely" thighs.
When she can't see them, the sense of touch will dominate, and during systematic and
lengthy excitation, she will feel desire and will experience pleasure.
The optimal number of men for rape is five. One to hold down one hand, a
second to hold down the other, a third to hold down one leg, and a fourth to hold
down the other. The fifth can then calmly go about exciting the woman. And the
woman, seeing so many men, will understand that it is useless to struggle, when she
might try to take on one or two men. When a woman begins to respond to the
excitation, the others will gradually loosen their hold and will either enter the action or
wait in line.
Therefore, we should not talk about the criminalization of rape, but about
teaching men how to properly perform a rape. Punishment should be reserved for
those men who cause pain or injury to a woman, instead of bringing her pleasure.
But society is uncomfortable delving into these finer points and so it throws
everything in the same basket and makes it necessary for a woman to sell her body,
but not in the open, not for money.
The Causes and Incentives of Prostitution
There are many causes, but here are the ones that are indisputable.
First, the fact that a woman needn't climax when screwing, that is, her ability
to be indifferent, means that she is able to accommodate men without taking a break.
Second, the simplicity, speed and naturalness of earning money just by
spreading your legs, opening your mouth or even using your hand. I mean, a woman
can do this job with one hand tied behind her back.
Third, the desire for more than one has.
We like to think that all women have enough money to live on and avoid
starvation, not wanting for the essentials. But, according to Seneca, the poor person is
not the one who has little, it is the one who wants more. And even the richest woman
at one moment or another will want more. There are women who become prostitutes
because of poverty, but poverty is relative. The woman who goes about today adorned
in costume jewelry today, will want real jewels tomorrow. And so, even if we feed
women grub and give them a place to live, it will turn out to be insufficient to
suppress the desire to want more. And this means that prostitution will continue at all
economic levels as long as women want a little more.
The humanitarian would like to see women engaged in prostitution not to earn
a crust of bread, but out of the desire to eat black caviar.
It is precisely a woman's need to have more than a screw--which is a source of
pride for every woman who demands that something more from a man--that is the
basis of prostitution, which is condemned by the majority of women.
Prostitutes exist (and their profession is referred to as the world's oldest for just this
reason) because the world's oldest desire is that of men to have a few more women.
And this is made possible only when one spends as little time as possible in
persuading the woman, which occurs in the presence of money, allowing one to enjoy
the maximum number of women--these would be prostitutes.
If we were to eradicate prostitution, men would lose their incentive to earn
money and the entire economy would break down.
Strip bars where broads dance naked have their origin in the slave market,
where naked slaves would be brought out and their charms displayed to potential
buyers. Today, most men who look at strippers couldn't afford to buy them and so
everything has devolved into a cheap game where the men smack their lips over
someone else's slave. However, you can make her your slave for a certain length of
time and for a certain sum of money. For a certain form of slavery.
Prostitution is a form of division of labor that simplifies life. Just as you don't have to
be a farmer in order to acquire food, you can just go to the store and buy some grub,
you don't need to be a husband in order to screw a woman, you can hire a prostitute
and buy some satisfaction.
The moralists attempt to connect sex and violence, but these two essences are
as opposed to one another as good and evil. And because wherever there is good, evil
will soon appear, it is absurd to begin a battle against good so that evil does not crop
up nearby. Violence arises only in opposition to sex. To do battle with sex and
violence at the same time is the same as doing battle with both good and evil.
The identification of sex and violence leads the masses to assume that through
violence you can arrive at sex. Insofar as society forbids sex to a greater degree than it
does violence, it is simpler for the masses to deal with violence in the hope of
enjoying the required supplement of pleasure. The general availability of women in
America has been replaced by the general availability of firearms. Having protected
violence constitutionally and maintained silence on the topic of sex, Americans make
do with generalities about the right to "pursue happiness." They are not about to pass
an amendment, similar to the first amendment that would forbid the passage of any
law restricting prostitution.
A woman consists of both required and optional parts. The optional parts are
those, without which you could manage, while the required parts are those that, after
the removal of whatever is superfluous, preserve her sexual attraction. If you take
away her cunt (together with her mouth and ass), then her sexual attraction disappears.
If you take away her mind, she remains just as sexually attractive as before.
Previously, when a woman engaged in fornication, she risked her life for her
future offspring, who often died at birth, endured public opprobrium if she lost her
virginity before marriage, continued to fornicate outside of marriage, or, worse yet,
had children out of wedlock. For this reason, the man was required to pay the woman
in the form of gifts, diversions, which was a kind of compensation for the risk and
oppression she suffered.
Today a woman will screw whenever and whomever she likes; she uses
contraception so risks nothing more than a man, while basking in liberal public
opinion that permits her to legally rob and destroy men. However, despite that, the
man pays all the same for this has nothing to do with advances in the social protection
of women; it has everything to do with the unchanging essence of prostitute-like malefemale relations.
The more people scream and condemn something, the less likely it is that it
really exists. People are always going on about equality and virtue and one of the
loudest fictions is that of eternal, monogamous love, which is the subject of art,
dreams, ideals, and upon which morality is built. But it is in fact transience that is the
fundamental characteristic of this emotion. Love is a perishable thing, but also one
that can ripen again and again. The woman who recognizes that is ready for
prostitution. For this reason, society makes such an effort to sprinkle the minds of
women with the powder of love in order to keep them enslaved to the illusion of
eternal love and to deny them permission to satisfy those men who long for them, for
society has its own plans for their energy.
Art for art's sake is just as foreign to the pragmatic nature of women as
pleasure for pleasure's sake, which may occur once or twice, but does not become a
system or way of life for women as it does for many men. With money.
The traditional dream of the prostitute is to meet a client who will marry her.
In this way, prostitution represents for her not only a way to make money, but also a
means to finding a stable life in marriage.
The only real favor a woman can perform is when, on her own initiative, she
spreads her legs for you for free.
A woman feels herself to be truly desired when someone pays money for her.
The more they pay, the more she respects herself.
As a rule, a woman can not determine her own worth. Her professional career,
no matter how successful it may be, cannot increase the most important source of her
self-worth--sex.
Whereas a man can raise his very low sexual self-esteem to the heavens with
money, for which the most beautiful prostitutes will indulge him like a favorite lover.
And for a woman, money that she has put away to pay for a screw can not lift her low
sexual self-esteem out of the gutter--for that she needs to receive money from her
beloved, not give it away.
In a scientific journal the feelings of men and women were diagramed in pie
charts. For women, sex does not occupy a significant part of the pie; most of the pie
was occupied with worrying about relationships. For men, the largest categories were:
sex, work, and sports.
It turns out that a significant part of a woman's psychological life (non-sexual
relations and concern over those relations) is made possible thanks to the help of an
insignificant part--sex. And for this reason, she must value sex highly so that with it (a
little piece of the pie) she can acquire a lot (the rest of the pie). This is essentially a
prostitute's pie chart.
A woman sells her body because no one is offering her any money for her
soul.
Generally accepted mores or morality is a mass game, in which by following
the rules one is able to satisfy one's desires at a subsistence level. But if one decides to
satisfy one's desires above that level, then it is necessary to cheat at the game or to
create one's own game of morals.
When men are driven by need to the brink, they resort to their physical
strength--they murder and rob. When women are driven by need to the brink, they
resort to the pleasure that languishes within them and become prostitutes. In critical
situations, women turn to love and men to violence. That is why a man is a "person
with a rifle"[29] and a woman is a "person with a cunt."
During fornication a prostitute can, for the same amount of money, depending
on the client and her own feelings at the time, experience either disgust, or slight
excitement, or strong excitement, or she can reach orgasm, moreover, more than once.
Current statistics love to maintain that prostitutes experience either disgust or
indifference. The statistics of the past were more romantic, flattering men with the
idea that prostitutes always experience sexual satisfaction.
However, every business demands that one emotionally disinvest and at the
same time that one feign emotional investment. Just as a doctor can not allow himself
to grieve over the suffering and pain of each and every patient, but must give the
appearance of deep emotional involvement in order to buoy the patient's spirits, a
prostitute is indifferent to the lust of her client but pretends to experience pleasure so
as to give him confidence. But it doesn't always turn out that way and doctors often
worry and suffer over patients, especially those who work in ambulances or with
children, etc. It's not so simple to entirely harden a human being.
The same can happens with prostitutes who treat men's terminal desire, their
incurable, eternally returning lust, their perpetual quest for variety in women.
Like a doctor, a prostitute is right to feel pride in her profession, for she brings
pleasure to her clients, pleasure that is obvious, beyond a doubt. The prostitute's client
is like the doctor's patient, insofar as he pays money for treatment. But the prostitute
has one fundamental advantage over the doctor: she guarantees satisfaction, while the
doctor cannot guarantee a cure.
The analogy of a prostitute to a doctor is not coincidental: temple prostitutes in
ancient times were considered capable of curing illnesses. Even their excretions were
considered curative.[30]
The comfort and calm that a doctor finds after work, at home with his family
and friends, the prostitute finds with her boyfriend who is often her pimp: hot and
excited from work, she can with a clean conscience reach climax with her boyfriend
and then relax before her next shift.
The verses by Brodsky included above as an epigraph suggest that there are
two jobs that are easily and naturally performed by women: feigning grief and
feigning love. It is no coincidence that cemetery prostitutes also worked as paid
mourners.[31] They weep and wail with the widower and other grieving relatives and
friends and then they comfort them among the graves--they raise their spirits and
show that as long as there is pleasure, life goes on. Prostitutes perform a host of
services in order to transform grief into joy. Having played the role of a mourner,
producing tears, the prostitute easily enters the role of lover, producing love juice. In
truth, there is no more humanitarian profession.
Why do we obediently pay lawyers astronomical sums for every minute of
their time, of which they keep careful records, for work, for which they assume no
responsibility, with the exception of those rare cases when they are caught committing
especially scandalous crimes? Lawyers receive their money, as a rule, regardless of
whether they win or lose the case. Because we have to pay to save ourselves from the
law when it has us by the throat.
Why must we rail against the payment of women who guarantee that we'll be
awarded pleasure? We are happy to pay her when the law of desire has us by the
prick. We must accept human laws, but we must joyously follow the laws of nature.
If prostitution is a despised occupation, which women perform exclusively for
money, then that is bad, like any despised occupation. But if it's a job that gives
satisfaction, moreover, not only physical, but also spiritual, then the professionalism
of the prostitute allows her to feel pleasure at the sight of the pleasure she brings, and
of the influence that she exercises over men. And this activity gives a prostitute a
sense of power over men and of her own might. One could really love that kind of
work.
A client to a prostitute: "It was a pleasure doing business with you."
The simple and direct question at the heart of prostitution is: if you give a
prostitute all the money she wants will she stop working as a prostitute? The simple
and direct answer: like Shura Balaganov in the Golden Calf by Ilf and Petrov who,
after receiving his share of a big heist, couldn't resist stealing a purse on his way
home, the prostitute will continue to moonlight out of habit. It's in her genes.
If you see fornication as a sacred act, then the more you do it, the holier you become.
By this logic, the prostitute who is capable of sleeping with dozens of men in a day is
the creature closest to the sacred. Her ability to bring pleasure to a large number of
men is a measure of her sacred power.
The collectivization of women into "communal" societies is just a means to
avoid paying women under the pretext of the fight against prostitution.[32]
A prostitute is a room in a hotel that different people occupy for different
amounts of time. Your own house where you live day in and day out is located
elsewhere, whereas you stay at various hotels. There are many rooms in a hotel and
for this reason it resembles a bordello. For this reason, for a long time now hotels have
been the site of the prostitute's professional activity.
Love your enemy--this is precisely what prostitutes do when they sleep with
men who despise and detest them, but nonetheless use their services. Perhaps this is
one of the psychological motivations behind prostitution.
Hatred of Prostitutes
The strongest negative reaction to prostitution comes from upstanding family
men, and what makes them upstanding is precisely the fact that their sexual life with
their wives, of whom they've grown sick and tired, either barely exists or doesn't exist
at all because their irreproachable wives have stopped giving out. A prostitute is for
them a living reproach and pornography is a non-living one.
True love of women naturally includes a love of prostitutes. Insofar as a
prostitute is another name for woman herself. The sacred whore is a phrase that is
made up not of two mutually exclusive terms but of two complementary terms. It is
easy to see that violent hatred for prostitution is a product of misogyny. Those who do
battle against prostitution hide their hostility toward women either behind the mask of
false, romantic love for a certain unattainable woman or behind the requisite fidelity
of their dreary wives, for whom they long ago lost any sexual interest.
The romantic view of woman is based on men's fear of the cunt. This is an
effect of his desperate concealment of his strong desire for the cunt and of his scorn
for it that comes from his lack of confidence in himself and in his ability to handle it.
This is the phenomenon of the fox and the grape, when a man begins to talk down the
cunt, calling it dirty, disgusting, contrasting it to the romantic image of woman, whose
sexual organs are never mentioned.
A woman is a forever ripe and always available grape. Often already oozing
and fermenting. Men, afraid of their weak stomachs, have raised the grape to
unattainable heights and sing the praises of its sweetness and purity, but despise those
who eat the grape, and the grape, too, when it falls from the heights, just missing their
drooling mouths.
The fable of "The Fox and the Grape" extends beyond the individual to all of
society, creating a mass psychosis involving the persecution of prostitutes.
If we begin with the notion that the individual secretly desires that which he
despises, and that that which he despises is inherent in him, then jealousy can be seen
as a reaction to the secret desire to share one's sexual partner. It's not surprising that,
because the prostitute shares herself with the maximum number of men, hatred toward
her takes extreme forms.
Well, you see I am angry all the time over the fact that women are by nature
prostitutes, or more likely, I am mad that they don't admit that they are prostitutes but
behave like prostitutes. Would this problem bother me so if I had money and fame
enough to buy women in abundance? Isn't it just because I'm indignant over the fact
that I just poor? And even if women would agree with me: yes, we're all prostitutes,
pay up. I would have no way to pay them with except with my freedom, from which a
woman would nonetheless squeeze out money. So everything depends on money, or
more likely, women depend on money. Well, this means in reality that everything
depends on money.
The most convincing pretext for the battle against prostitution is venereal
disease, supposedly inherent in prostitutes and spread by them. However, statistics
show[33] that only a minimal number of men are infected from prostitutes. They catch
venereal diseases from "proper" women who don't take care of their hygiene, don't
know the symptoms, and don't use condoms. Fear of AIDS has now got to the point
that abstinence is promoted as the only form of acceptable behavior for unmarried
people.
Gastronomical analogies unavoidably come to mind as they are the most easily
understood, reflecting, like lust, that other inalienable condition of man: hunger. If an
epidemic of dysentery or cholera were to arise, in which infection was being
transmitted through food, it would not be possible to take up arms against food, to
declare it against the law and to treat people with hunger. No, a person with a will to
live would begin to wash his fruit and vegetables, to pasteurize, boil, and disinfect, but
eat all the same. It's the same with prostitutes. They've already tried to boil them and
burn them, to drown them as witches, but science invented more effective means for
fighting infections. We must take up arms not against prostitutes, but against the
diseases themselves that are spread by amateurs to a greater degree than by
professionals, who take great care of their "weapons of production." But, all the same,
they continue to kill the messenger.
Prostitutes are women who give access to the greatest pleasure and for that
alone one should feel gratitude and respect. However, it is precisely for that that they
are despised and persecuted with tremendous urgency. In truth, it is the Russian
approach: Beat the one you love.
In Russian, the word "prostitutka" is associated with betrayal. (The "prostitute
Trotsky," as Lenin put it.) But what is the betrayal of the prostitute? Is it that she
openly proclaims to everyone that she is available for money? Is it that her concept of
fidelity has nothing to do with allowing only one prick to enter her? No, real betrayal
happens when someone promises fidelity for life and then breaks that promise--and
repeatedly--through divorce, break-ups, and partings. The prostitute never gives such
promises. From the very start she announces with her behavior that you must not in
any circumstances rely on her womanly fidelity. For this reason, there is no betrayal,
there is only fidelity to the price. Fidelity to her own body.
Moreover, the mercinariness of the prostitute makes her more reliable; her
advertised price instills confidence in her availability.
Many men develop manias regarding a certain woman stemming from the
belief that she should be in love with him, which means that she shouldn't sleep with
other men. According to this pre-condition, any woman who is seduced by another
man turns out to be a "prostitute," something that her man will not fail to call her.
Mercenariness that is another synonym for prostitution. Selling yourself not
for an idea as men do, but for money. But why can you sell your blood, your sperm,
your eggs, and for that no one calls you mercenary, but sell "access to your body" and
they label you mercenary?
What makes prostitutes dirty for men? Male excretions erupting in the
prostitute's body. That is, men are squeamish not about prostitution, but about the
excretions of their fellow men. In the prostitute one senses too strongly the presence
of other men, and that scares every man that comes after. So it's not the prostitute that
a man insults, but the other men who were inside her before him. In this way, by
despising and humiliating a prostitute, a man is unconsciously taking care of his
rivals.
Do we consider lesbian prostitutes dirty when she sells herself exclusively to
women? No. Do we consider gigolos dirty when they sleep with women for money?
No. Only the prostitute is considered dirty for a man. This is male hatred of another
man's sperm! Of his rival's sperm.
What insults and angers a man about prostitutes more than anything else is that
she doesn't fall in love with him. Hatred of prostitutes is the strongest form of
jealousy. Masculine self-love is destroyed by prostitutes. Every man wants to think
that he's the only one, while she sleeps with these "only ones" by the dozen. Jealousy
is primarily a symptom of one's decline, and the jealous man demonstrates this vividly
in their hatred of prostitutes.
The wreath that was worn by a certain prostitute had the inscription: "Love me
forever, but don't be jealous of those who do the same."[34]
A woman is born with the physiological capacity to separate sex and love. A
woman can achieve orgasm by masturbating alone, but might not while having sex
with her beloved boyfriend.
Prostitutes have taken this separation to the extreme, while men, who joyfully
ejaculate in any cunt, still have a long way to go to convince themselves morally of
the immutability and logic of this separation of emotions in women. But often, alas,
this ability of women inspires malice in men, for whom such a separation doesn’t
come naturally.
The Future of Prostitution
If this never was in the past, nor in the present, then all our hopes are pinned
on the future. And there, one can do anything at all. And so, here we will dream of
anything at all. That is, of whatever we want. Everybody wants different things,
which means--everyone wants the very same thing.
In ancient times, an abundance of prostitutes was made possible by female
slaves. Today, their ranks are filled by women from Eastern Europe and Russia. But
when the economic situation is equalized throughout the world, the flow of women
from other countries will dry up. Then science will come up with a she-savior--they'll
learn to construct real female bodies to replace rubber dolls and artificial cunts.
Prostitutes will be made from the cloning of beautiful women. Now guys fight
in lines for the favor of this or that beauty. And usually without success. But soon
they'll produce tens of thousands of Sharon Stones--there won't even be lines. You'll
register in advance, and one day you'll spend with Sharon, then next with Karen, and
the third with Marion. Put your money down and the beauty of your choice will lick
you, embrace you, suck you. And cloning is such that the cloned women will overflow
with passion, for these babes will be built only for fucking and will think of nothing
else; they'll be unable to give birth. Refined lust. But you'll still need to pay: for their
creation, salary, food, lodging, and whatever else they might need. Guys will have to
fork it over, just like before. But with enormous joy.
And so there'll be heaps of prostitutes, beautiful and varied, able and healthy.
And, when a guy has had his fill, he returns to his family to raise his children, care for
his wife, develop his mind, and to tinker around the house.
When hunting for a woman, a man will first wound her and then fuck her. He'll
only lightly wound her so that she'll offer no resistance and will burn with lust. The
"wounding" will occur with the help of special medicine, an electric shock, or
something else, that'll they think up to make a woman's consent unnecessary. In this
way, prostitution in its present form will disappear. For the right to take part in such a
hunt, you'll have to pay a fee to some government agency.
The church's monopoly on contact with God will be broken. Now prostitution
is the church in exile and prostitutes are "old believers." In the future, prostitutes will
once again be priests, sermonizing with their bodies, performing miracles more
amazing than those of Christ. The same miracles that they perform today, but for
which they are prosecuted.
Next to the obligatory notice on the labels of alcoholic beverages to the effect
that alcohol may be harmful to pregnant women, Americans will soon add that alcohol
may cause sexual excitement, which one should bewared, or better yet--suppress.
Male artists typically draw the female nude. On the pretext that it's beautiful.
But in reality, what one wants is what's beautiful.
To pay someone to model nude, something that's illegal in public, is
acceptable, even for a large group of artists, who lick their lines off a naked woman.
The justification here is aesthetic--it's okay because it's art. Accordingly, fornication
must be considered beautiful, just as individual nude bodies are, for when two bodies
unite, their beauty doesn't diminish, it increases at least twofold. And so, if the
coupling of beautiful bodies is aesthetic, then paying for it should be considered just
as lawful as paying for a nude model. Which means that prostitution in the name of
beauty would be permitted.
In the desert of Nevada stand the only legal bordellos in America--oases of
happiness. Soon the deserts will be irrigated and bear fruit. And all that was once
desert will be turned into a bordello.
In the middle of the city stands a gated fortress, not for the government, but for
prostitutes. Guards are stationed at the gates to prevent children, drunks and
"protestants" from entering. Only adults are allowed in for an entrance fee. And
inside, everything is free.
The slogan of men throughout the world: "Available women at an affordable
price!" I hope that it won't require yet another revolution to bring this about. Science
will come to the rescue.
O, if only it were possible to take every man who is against prostitution, tie
him up and place on top of him a beautiful prostitute, who would caress him without
bringing him to orgasm and would record on videotape how he relaxes, how, when
he's untied, he demands to be bound again in order to cum, at which point another
prostitute approaches him unnoticed from behind and lodges a bullet in his the back of
his head the moment he climaxes. And let this film be shown everywhere and let there
be beautiful prostitutes on every corner, attracting throngs of men, and more and more
prostitutes would come, and on a huge screen like the one at Times Square, let this
film be shown, in which a man who only recently fought against prostitution is now
joyfully fornicating with these prostitutes, and when the son-of-a-bitch is in the throes
of orgasm, they shoot him. So that no one opposes the miracle of fucking.
It's shameful that the proponents of prostitution are always playing defense,
while their opponents are continually on the offensive. It should be the other way
around. Prostitutes and the people who fuck them shouldn't have to justify themselves,
excuse themselves, or be afraid. Instead, they should go on the attack against every
hypocrite who dares to infringe on their right to sex.
If we were to expose the private life of everyone who fights against
prostitution, it would turn out that all the men are losers in their personal life or are
incapable of having one.
It is absolutely necessary for every "proper" woman to spend a certain amount
of time in a public house in order to deprive her of the right to look down her nose at
prostitutes. This would also remove the fake halo from "proper" women. Similarly,
requiring men to visit public houses on a regular basis would deprive them of the right
to come out against prostitution.
A dog can be trained to respond to a whistle: one whistle, he comes, two
whistles, he stays, three whistles, he lies down. And with what joy and efficiency he
subordinates himself to his master. Women should be trained like that. All of them
everywhere. So that when you're walking down the street and see a good-looking
broad, you take out your whistle and blow on it three times. And when you blow on it
the fourth time, she runs away.
In addition to cloning, scientists will create artificial beings who, like any
invention, will make any fantasy come true, in this case, the fantasy of a genie in a
bottle. A woman will materialize in a puff of smoke from a bottle, you'll amuse
yourself until you're fully sated, and then she'll go back into the bottle with another
puff of smoke. These portable women will fill the role of the concubine, but without
any pretensions. And as wives they will be chaste, caring, loving mothers--beautiful
and wise helpmeets. But you'll be able to send them back into their bottle.
Naturally, what I'm writing is all from the point of view of a man. I'm not
trying to occupy the point of view of a woman. Let them stand on their own point. The
one atop the letter i. This letter is like a prick as it releases its first drop of cum.
The recruiting of new prostitutes will be the task of every prostitute, second in
importance only to the satisfaction of a client. A prostitute will introduce a friend,
who may be afraid to sell her body, to her best client, who will then seduce her, satisfy
her physically and, on top of that, pay her for it. Understanding that there was nothing
horrible in the experience, the novice will begin to look for her own clients. At first,
she'll have to work a second job or combine prostitution with marriage, but then, when
things pick up, she'll switch to prostitution full-time. An experienced prostitute will
supervise her and receive a percentage of all the novice's earnings for as long as she
works. When a prostitute recruits a great number of new prostitutes, she can live off
these commissions, engaging in prostitution from time to time, but mostly sharing her
experience with her hirelings and with those recruited by her recruits. At first, a client,
then a family, and then God. For God is there in the copulation with a client.
There should either be one hundred times fewer men than women or one
hundred times more women than men. Science will decide. And then the cost of a
woman will be only symbolic.
The Internet and its offshoots will someday allow us to send an "I want!" into
cyberspace, and we'll then get a price, a description of services, and the address where
they're available. Or even better, you'll be able to receive a woman in an email
attachment. You just open the file and she'll materialize. When you're done, you put
her in the trash bin on your computer.
Over the last few years, the use of pornography has sharply increased. Thanks
to the ubiquity of videos, the Internet, Ken Starr, art, and advertising, all saturated
with sexual images that are becoming more and more widely accepted. And, despite
this, prostitution in America is illegal. Pornography will soon grow to a volume that
they'll start imprisoning you for cheating on your wife.
If prostitution is legalized as a necessary concession, as the lesser of two evils,
it will remain a social problem. Prostitution will be, in that case, merely tolerated,
which means that there will be moments when our leaders run out of patience and it
will be once again criminalized. The legalization of prostitution must be based on a
return of its divine, sacred character, so that prostitution will be considered the most
honorable profession, the one closest to God, the holiest. In the distant future, people
will realize, admit and openly cling to the miracle of orgasm and pleasure, embodied
in the prostitute, and the essence of the world will change. The world will once again
be pagan, but on a scientific-technical foundation that reaches for the stars.
Minneapolis, 1998
For additional information please contact:
M.I.P. Company
POB 27484
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 U.S.A.
mp@mipco.com
http://www.mipco.com
[1] Bullough, Vern, The History of Prostitution (New York: University Books, 1964), 22.
[2] Edwardes, A., The Jewel in the Lotus (New York: Julian Press, 1964), 131.
[3] Walker, Barbara G., The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets (San Francisco: Harper Collins
Publishers, 1983), 821.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Genesis 38: 23.
[6] Bullough, 33-34.
[7] Bullough, 86.
[8] Mantegazza, P., The Sexual Relations of Mankind (New York: Eugenics Publishing Company, 1935),
255.
[9] Bullough, 29.
[10] Ibid, 45.
[11] Tannahill, R., Sex in History (New York: Stein and Day, 1980), 79.
[12] Mantegazza, 261.
[13] Tannahill, 279.
[14] Walker, 823.
[15] Russian poet (1880-1932)
[16] Walker, 822.
[17] Polo, Marco, The Book of Ser Marco Polo. Trans. and ed. by Col. Sir Henry Yule (London: John
Murray, 1903), 203.
[18] By the time Russian Tsar Alexander II emancipated the serfs in l861, a new generation of liberals had
evolved by following the tenets of scientific materialism. This new generation of Russian intelligentsia
were radicals known as the raznochintsy. The raznochintsy differed from the Socialists of the l840s in two
ways; they were more frustrated and more activist.
[19] Lebina, N.B. and M.V. Skorovskii, Prostitutsiia v Peterburge (Moscow: Press-Akademiia, 1983),
123.
[20] Camphausen, Rufus C., The Encyclopedia of Erotic Wisdom (Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions
International, 1991), 102.
[21] Tannahill, 356.
[22] Mantegazza, 256.
[23] Ibid.
[24] This is the title of a song from the film Gentlemen Prefer Blondes starring Marilyn Monroe.
[25] Califia, Pat, “Whoring in Utopia,” Gauntlet Magazine Vol 7 (1994), 136.
[26] Beauvoir, Simone de, The Second Sex. Trans. by H. M. Parshley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964),
557.
[27] Bullough, 44.
[28] The Second Sex, 557.
[29] The title of the old popular Soviet film about Bolshevik revolution in in1917.
[30] Walker, 820.
[31] Murphy, E. Great Bordellos of the World (London: Quartet Books, 1983) 45.
[32] Lebina and Skarovskii, 180.
[33] Califia, Pat, “Whoring in Utopia,” Gauntlet Magazine Vol 7 (1994), page 17.
[34] Bullough, Vern, The History of Prostitution (New York: University Books, 1964), 40.